Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-cell multiplex imaging (scMI) measures cell locations and phenotypes within a tissue and can be used to understand the tumor microenvironment. In scMI studies, it is often of interest to quantify spatial co-localization of immune cells and its association with clinical outcomes; however, it remains unknown which of the many available spatial indices have adequate power to detect spatial within-sample co-localization and its association with patient outcomes, such as survival. In this study, the performance of six frequentist metrics of spatial co-localization used in scMI studies were evaluated. Simulated data was used to assess the power and Type I error of these spatial metrics to detect significant co-localization. Furthermore, these spatial co-localization methods were applied to two scMI studies—a high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) study and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) study—to detect within-sample co-localization between cell types and their sensitivity to detect differences in survival across samples. In the simulation study, Ripley’s K had the greatest power to identify co-localization followed closely by pair correlation g; all other statistics showed little power across all simulation scenarios. In the application of the methods to cancer studies, the results consistently point to pair correlation g and Ripley’s K as indices with the most power for detecting significant co-localization in scMI data. Furthermore, pair correlation g, Ripley’s K, and the scLMM index were most effective for estimating between-sample associations between level of co-localization and survival. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soupir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: