Key result
The rbio5.5 wavelet basis and Irls algorithm optimize heart sound signal reconstruction in compressed sensing.
Why the study?
Compressed sensing has become a promising technology for heart sound signal acquisition in wireless body sensor networks, but comparative performance data on wavelet bases, reconstruction algorithms, and frames are needed.
This technical study provides benchmarks for optimizing compressed sensing parameters in wireless body sensor networks for heart sound monitoring.
Optimizes heart sound reconstruction parameters in wireless networks; leaves open clinical validation before any monitoring adoption.
With the application of wireless body sensing network to real-time monitoring of biological signals, compressed sensing (CS) has become a promising signal acquisition technology that can extend monitoring time, reduce equipment cost and decrease power consumption. This paper makes a comparative study on the acquisition of heart sound (HS) signals by CS, compares and analyzes the performance of wavelet basis, reconstruction algorithms and frames. Among a large number of experimental data records, the reconstruction performance under different compression rates is comparatively studied, and the suitable wavelet basis, reconstruction algorithm and signal frame size for HS acquisition are obtained. The presented performance records and comparative analyses can give benchmarks for future academic research, and are also believed to be beneficial for practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2020) studied Heart sound signals (n=100). Compressed sensing with various wavelet basis and reconstruction algorithms was evaluated on Reconstruction quality (Percentage root-mean-squared difference and structural similarity index) and execution time. The rbio5.5 wavelet basis and iteratively reweighted least squares (Irls) algorithm provided the best reconstruction quality for heart sound signals using compressed sensing.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: