Clinical review highlights elevated stroke and bleeding risks in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation and kidney disease, indicating the need for individualized anticoagulation.
A bidirectional relationship exists between atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic renal disease. Patients with AF have a higher incidence of renal dysfunction, and the latter predisposes to incident AF. The coexistence of both conditions results in a higher risk for thromboembolic-related adverse events but a paradoxical increased hemorrhagic risk. Oral anticoagulants (both vitamin K antagonists [VKAs] and non-VKA oral anticoagulants [NOACs]) have been demonstrated to be effective in mild to moderate renal dysfunction. Patients with severe renal impairment were excluded from the non-VKA oral anticoagulant trials, so limited data are available. In end-stage renal failure, the net clinical benefit of VKAs in dialysis-dependent patients remains uncertain, although some evidence suggests that such patients may do well with high-quality anticoagulation control. Risk stratification and careful follow-up of such patients are necessary to ensure a net clinical benefit from thromboprophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2016) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Oral anticoagulants (VKAs and NOACs) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: