Key result
Cuff inflation during 24-hour ABPM does not increase heart rate versus Holter monitoring.
Why the study?
The potential increase in heart rate due to discomfort from cuff inflation during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with chronic kidney disease was uncertain.
Does the discomfort of cuff inflation during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring increase heart rate compared to 24-hour Holter monitoring in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
No
Does the discomfort of cuff inflation during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring increase heart rate compared to 24-hour Holter monitoring in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Cuff inflation during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring does not significantly increase heart rate, supporting its reliability for blood pressure evaluation in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Cuff inflation during ABPM does not increase HR in CKD; leaves open generalizability beyond this small observational cohort.
Cuff inflation during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and heart rate Mia Skov-Madsen, My Svensson, Jeppe Hagstrup ChristensenDepartment of Nephrology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, DenmarkIntroduction: Twenty four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a clinically validated procedure in evaluation of blood pressure (BP). We hypothesised that the discomfort during cuff inflation would increase the heart rate (HR) measured with 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring compared to a following HR measurement with a 24-h Holter monitor.Methods: The study population (n = 56) were recruited from the outpatient’s clinic at the Department of Nephrology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital at Aalborg, Denmark. All the patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD). We compared HR measured with a 24-h Holter monitor with a following HR measured by a 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring.Results: We found a highly significant correlation between the HR measured with the Holter monitor and HR measured with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (r = 0.77, p < 0.001). Using the Bland-Altman plot, the mean difference in HR was only 0.5 beat/min during 24 hours with acceptable limits of agreement for both high and low HR levels. Dividing the patients into groups according to betablocker treatment, body mass index, age, sex, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment, statins treatment, diuretic treatment, or calcium channel blocker treatment revealed similar results as described above.Conclusion: The results indicate that the discomfort induced by cuff inflation during 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring does not increase HR. Thus, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring may be a reliable measurement of the BP among people with CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mia Skov-Madsen (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic kidney disease (n=56). 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring vs. 24-h Holter monitor was evaluated on Heart rate (MD 0.5, p=<0.001). Cuff inflation during 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring did not increase heart rate compared to Holter monitoring (mean difference 0.5 beats/min; r=0.77, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: