Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess functional results after Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients operated on for complete rectal prolapse between 1995 and 1998 were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with regard to anal incontinence, constipation, evacuation difficulties, and overall satisfaction with a standardized questionnaire. Anal continence assessment was based on a clinical scoring system. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 13 (range, 12-57) months, no prolapse recurred. Preoperative and postoperative rates of incontinence were 81 percent (25/31) and 55 percent (17/31), respectively (P < 0.03). Continence improved in 24 (96 percent) of the 25 patients who were incontinent before surgery. The mean incontinence score decreased from 11.7 +/- 7.8 preoperatively to 3.2 +/- 4.2 postoperatively (P < 0.001). The self-reported constipation rate was 61 percent (19/31) before surgery and 71 percent (22/31) after surgery (P = nonsignificant). Constipation appeared or worsened in 16 patients (52 percent), whereas it disappeared or improved in 8 (26 percent; P = nonsignificant). Evacuation difficulties increased significantly after surgery from 23 percent (7/31) to 61 percent (19/31; P < 0.003). Ninety-seven percent of patients reported good or very good satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Transabdominal Orr-Loygue rectopexy resulted in improved continence and a high satisfaction level. Despite a significant postoperative increase in evacuation difficulties, only a 10 percent (nonsignificant) increase in the self-reported constipation rate was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douard et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: