Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nitric Oxide (NO) is released from parallel fibers (PFs) after PF stimulation. NO-cGMP signaling is essential for long-term depression (LTD) in cerebellar PF-Purkinje cell synapses, which also exhibit presynaptic long-term potentiation (LTP) after tetanic PF stimulation. This LTP is dependent on cAMP but not NO-cGMP signaling. In this study, we analyzed long-term changes of NO release from PFs in rat cerebellar slices using electrochemical NO probes. Repetitive PF stimulation at 10 Hz for 2 sec elicited a transient increase in NO concentration (2.2 +/- 0.1 nM; mean +/- SEM; n = 116). This NO release exhibited long-term potentiation (LTPNO) by 36 +/- 3% (n = 15) after tetanic PF stimulation. Induction of LTPNO was not affected by Glu receptor antagonists. NO release from PFs was also potentiated by L-Arg (ARG) (100 microM), forskolin (50 microM), and 8-bromo-cAMP (Br-cAMP) (1 mM) but not by 1,9-dideoxyforskolin (50 microM), a biologically inactive analog of forskolin. The potentiation induced by forskolin was significantly suppressed by H89 (10 microM), a blocker of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. The potentiation induced by forskolin, but not that induced by Arg, interfered with LTPNO. H89 (10 microM) and KT5720 (1 microM), another blocker of cAMP-dependent protein kinase, but not KT5823 (300 nM), a blocker of cGMP-dependent protein kinase, significantly suppressed LTPNO. These data indicate that neural NO release is under activity-dependent control, just as synaptic transmitter release is. LTPNO might play a role in cross talk between presynaptic and postsynaptic plasticity by facilitating NO-cGMP-dependent postsynaptic LTD after induction of cAMP-dependent presynaptic LTP and LTPNO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: