Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper considers sequential detection and classification of multiple transient signals from vector observations corrupted with additive noise and multiple types of structured interference. Sparse approximations of observations are found to facilitate computation of the likelihood of each signal model without relying on restrictive assumptions concerning the distribution of observations. Robustness to interference may be incorporated by virtue of the inherent separation capabilities of sparse coding. Each signal model is characterized by a Bayesian Network, which captures the temporal dependency structure among coefficients in successive sparse approximations under the associated hypothesis. Generalized likelihood ratios tests may then be used to perform signal detection and classification during quiescent periods, and quiescent detection whenever a signal is present. The results of applying the proposed method to a national park soundscape analysis problem demonstrate its practical utility for detecting and classifying real acoustical sources present in complex sonic environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wachowski et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: