Key result
CYP2C9 variant carriers linked to ~19% lower time in therapeutic INR range vs wild-type patients.
Why the study?
The impact of CYP2C9 allelic variants on the stability of warfarin anticoagulation within the first 3 months after elective heart valve replacement was unclear.
Does the presence of CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 genotypes reduce time in the therapeutic INR range in patients within the first 3 months following heart valve replacement?
Case-Control (n=43)
Randomized to coagulometers or local clinic INR monitoring (carrier group only)
Does the presence of CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 genotypes reduce time in the therapeutic INR range in patients within the first 3 months following heart valve replacement?
The presence of CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 genotypes is associated with less stable warfarin anticoagulation and more time above the therapeutic range in the first 3 months after heart valve replacement.
May warrant closer INR monitoring in CYP2C9 variant carriers post-valve replacement; leaves open whether genotyping improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Warfarin dose requirements are partly determined by common single nucleotide polymorphisms in VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate how the presence of allelic variants in CYP2C9 affects the stability of anticoagulation in patients within the first 3 months following elective heart valve replacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a case-control study we compared 18 consecutive carriers of CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 and 25 well-matched patients with the wild type CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype. The former group was randomly assigned to use coagulometers or monitor international normalized ratio (INR) in local outpatient clinics. Subjects receiving drugs potently interfering with warfarin were ineligible. Anticoagulation with the baseline warfarin regimens based on pharmacogenetic algorithm was assessed by time in the therapeutic INR range (TTR) within the first 3 months following implantation. RESULTS: Carriers of the CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 genotypes were characterized by lower estimated warfarin dose (median, 21 [interquartile range, 21-35] vs. 35 [28-42] mg/week, p=0.02) and actual (27.8±13.2 vs. 46.3±13.9 mg/week, p<0.001), together with lower TTR values (56 [38.6-74.9] vs. 75.4 [58.1-83.6] %, p=0.03) and longer time above the therapeutic range (13.8 [4.9-34.5] vs. 4.5 [0-15.3]%, p=0.047) than patients with the CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype. There were no differences in the estimated and actual warfarin doses, TTR values and adverse events between the self-testing and standard-care subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 genotypes is associated with unstable warfarin treatment in patients after heart valve replacement, regardless of the type of INR testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wypasek et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Heart valve replacement (n=43). CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 genotypes vs. CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype was evaluated on Time in the therapeutic INR range (TTR) (p=0.03). Carriers of CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 genotypes had significantly lower time in the therapeutic INR range compared to wild-type patients (56% vs 75.4%, p=0.03) following heart valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: