Key result
Crystalline sirolimus-coated balloons undergo evaluation for 12-month TLF in 1,302 CAD patients.
Why the study?
Sirolimus-coated balloon catheters have recently emerged as an alternative to treat restenosis, but their safety and efficacy in an unselective, international, large-scale patient population remain to be determined.
Does crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon (cSCB) angioplasty reduce target lesion failure at 12 months compared to iopromide-paclitaxel coated balloon in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=1,302)
Open-label
Yes
Does crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon (cSCB) angioplasty reduce target lesion failure at 12 months compared to iopromide-paclitaxel coated balloon in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease?
This paper describes the design and methodology of the SCORE trial, which will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon in an all-comers population with coronary artery disease.
Does not support routine use of crystalline sirolimus-coated balloons; this trial leaves open their efficacy versus standards in CAD.
BACKGROUND: A decade ago, the iopromide-paclitaxel coated balloon (iPCB) was added to the cardiologist's toolbox to initially treat in-stent restenosis followed by the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. In the meantime, DES technologies have been substantially improved to address in-stent restenosis and thrombosis, and shortened anti-platelet therapy. Recently, sirolimus-coated balloon catheters (SCB) have emerged to provide an alternative drug to combat restenosis. METHODS: The objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of a novel crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon (cSCB) technology in an unselective, international, large-scale patient population. Percutaneous coronary interventions of native stenosis, in-stent stenosis, and chronic total occlusions with the SCB in patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome were included. The primary outcome variable is the target lesion failure (TLF) rate at 12 months, defined as the composite rate of target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), cardiac death or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary outcome variables include TLF at 24 months, ischemia driven TLR at 12 and 24 months and all-cause death, cardiac death at 12 and 24 months. DISCUSSION: Since there is a wealth of patient-based all-comers data for iPCB available for this study, a propensity-score matched analysis is planned to compare cSCB and iPCB for the treatment of de novo and different types of ISR. In addition, pre-specified analyses in challenging lesion subsets such as chronic total occlusions will provide evidence whether the two balloon coating technologies differ in their clinical benefit for the patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04470934.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otto et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=1,302). Crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon (cSCB) vs. Historic iopromide-paclitaxel coated balloon (iPCB) was evaluated on Target lesion failure (TLF) rate at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: