Key result
Wait-and-see idarucizumab achieves hemostasis in 4 of 5 patients with AF ablation tamponade on dabigatran.
Why the study?
Optimal idarucizumab usage strategy for acute pericardial tamponade during uninterrupted dabigatran therapy in AF ablation patients was unclear.
Does a 'wait and see' strategy of idarucizumab provide safe and feasible hemostasis in patients with acute pericardial tamponade during AF ablation on uninterrupted dabigatran?
Observational (n=10)
No
Does a 'wait and see' strategy of idarucizumab provide safe and feasible hemostasis in patients with acute pericardial tamponade during AF ablation on uninterrupted dabigatran?
A 'wait and see' strategy for idarucizumab administration following pericardiocentesis appears safe and feasible for managing acute pericardial tamponade during AF ablation in patients on uninterrupted dabigatran.
May support idarucizumab 'wait-and-see' use in tamponade during dabigatran AF ablation; leaves open need for prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate theoptimal idarucizumab (dabigatran antagonist) usage strategy for patients with acute pericardial tamponade receiving uninterrupted dabigatran during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Ten patients presenting acute pericardial tamponade while receiving uninterrupted dabigatran during catheter ablation for AF in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2019 to July 2020 were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. A "wait and see" strategy of idarucizumab was carried out for all patients; in brief, idarucizumab was applied following pericardiocentesis, comprehensive evaluation of bleeding and hemostasis. RESULTS: There were five males, five paroxysmal AF, and the average age of the patients was 64.0 ± 9.8 years. Among the 10 patients, four were treated with dabigatran 110 mg, six were treated with dabigatran 150 mg, and one was simultaneously given clopidogrel. The average time from pericardial tamponade to the last dose of dabigatran was 8.2 ± 3.4 h. All patients underwent pericardiocentesis successfully, and the average drainage volume was 322.5 ml (220.0 ± 935.0 ml). For reversal anticoagulation, six patients received protamine, and five patients received idarucizumab. Of the five patients who were treated with idarucizumab, four presented exact hemostasis, except for one patient who underwent continuous drainage and finally received surgery repair. The average time to restart anticoagulation was 1.1 ± 0.3 days after the procedure, and no rebleeding, embolism or deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: The "wait and see" strategy of idarucizumab for acute pericardial tamponade during the perioperative period of catheter ablation for AF may be safe and feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute pericardial tamponade during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (n=10). "Wait and see" strategy of idarucizumab was evaluated. A 'wait and see' strategy of idarucizumab for acute pericardial tamponade during AF ablation on uninterrupted dabigatran achieved exact hemostasis in 4 of 5 treated patients, with no deaths.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: