The introduction of breast cancer screening programs worldwide led not only to the increase of non-invasive carcinoma and stage I breast cancer percentage but also to the redistribution of biological tumor subtypes in female population screened. The proportion of stage I breast cancer is only 21,4% in our country; biological and predictive value of tumor size (T1a, T1b and T1c) is still undefined. We analyzed clinical and morphological characteristics as well as tumor size prognostic value (T1a-c) for the recurrence and death from progression risk determination in 1341 breast cancer patients with stage I tumors. We revealed progressive increase of “small” tumors proportion (T1a and T1b) in stage I breast cancer population within the last 25 years. The percentage of microinvasive carcinomas raised from 0,3% to 4,3% while T1bN0M0 proportion increased from 8,7% to 22,1%; this is the evidence of early breast cancer diagnostics improvement. Stage I breast cancer is the heterogeneous group of tumors with favorable prognosis in case of T1a (≤5 mm) and more aggressive behavior in T1b (6–10 mm) and T1c (11–20 mm). Only T1a tumors have favorable biological profile (huge proportion of luminal A subtype) which reflects upon the long-term treatment results (minimum recurrences and cancer deaths, improved overall survival). Biological behavior of T1b and T1c tumors is more aggressive with high rates of ductal carcinoma, luminal B and triple negative subtypes which significantly worsen the prognosis. The biology of “small” tumors should be considered when choosing the optimal adjuvant treatment algorithm for breast cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolyadina et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: