Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Within-group (pre-post) designs are commonly employed in home healthcare research because patient and professional study populations present with heterogeneous characteristics, recruitment is often challenging, and well-matched control groups are often infeasible to assemble. However, these designs typically involve small sample sizes, outcomes measured in field settings, and data conditions marked by heteroskedasticity, non-normality, and outliers both unplanned and associated with the frequent use of ordinal scales to collect data. To address these issues, a Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate the characteristics of four one-sided paired tests used in within-group analyses as to recommend the best baseline test for home healthcare researchers: the paired samples t test, the Wilcoxon signed-rank (WSR) test, and two Bayesian paired-samples t tests with default priors (Cauchy, Normal). The simulated data were designed specifically to reflect conditions commonly encountered in home health research, including small sample sizes (N = 10-50), heavy-tailed distributions, contamination by 5% extreme posttest outliers, and heteroskedasticity introduced by doubling posttest variance relative to pretest. Type I error rates were calibrated to 5% across all methods to ensure fair comparison. Results indicated that the WSR provided the most consistent performance across both normal and non-normal data environments, maintaining 5% Type I error and achieving higher average power under the heavy-tailed, contaminated, and heteroskedastic conditions most representative of home healthcare outcomes. Bayesian procedures outperformed the paired samples t-test in many conditions, but neither consistently exceeded the WSR. The paired samples t-test remained competitive only under clean normal, homoskedastic data with very small effects. Overall, findings support the WSR as the safest default test for small-sample within-group home health studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel W. Martin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: