A comparative analysis using both independent contrasts (CAIC) and a species level analysis was used to investigate the allometric scaling of avian wing‐bone lengths. Total arm ( ta =humerus+ulna+manus) scaled with positive allometry as body mass ( M ) 0.37–0.39 . Similarly, and in accordance with previous studies, wing‐span ( b ) was positively allometric, but CAIC suggested a lower allometric exponent ( M 0.35 ) than found using species as independent data points ( M 0.39 ). Contrary to previous studies, individual wing‐bones appear to scale with similar exponents against M and scale isometrically with ta . In addition to a general trend for larger birds to have longer wings, wing‐bones and ta , their ta was a larger proportion of their b . A detailed study of primary feather length and elbow joint angle across a wide range of bird species and bird size, however, is required before a conclusive explanation for this increase in ta relative to b in larger birds can be established. Scaling equations are presented that can be used to predict M , ta and b from individual wing‐bone lengths, which may be of use to palaeontologists wishing to reconstruct whole animals from single bones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert L. Nudds (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: