Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early-phase clinical trials in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) have shown positive results of mononuclear cell therapy. The current meta-analysis investigated whether cluster of differentiation (CD) 34 + mononuclear cell therapy (CD34 + MCT) is effective for no-option CLI. Ten randomized controlled clinical studies of CD34 + MCT for no-option CLI with 479 patients were identified and analyzed for pooled results. Compared to control groups, the CD34 + MCT was associated with lower total amputation (odds ratio (OR): 0.45, p=0.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24–0.85) and a higher complete ulcer healing rate (OR: 2.80, p=0.008; 95% CI: 1.31–6.02), but showed no advantage in major amputation (OR: 0.58, p=0.11; 95% CI: 0.29–1.14) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.82, p=0.62; 95% CI: 0.36–1.83) . Studies with a high CD34 + cell dosage showed significant results in major amputation (OR: 0.38, p=0.002; 95% CI: 0.21–0.70), total amputation (OR: 0.31, p=0.0002; 95% CI: 0.17–0.57) and complete ulcer healing (OR: 7.58, p=0.0005; 95% CI: 2.40–23.88), which were not observed in the low-dose studies. However, inclusion of placebo-controlled studies showed no improvement of the CD34 + MCT in total amputation (OR: 0.67, p=0.42; 95% CI: 0.25–1.79), major amputation (OR: 1.31, p=0.43; 95% CI: 0.67–2.54) or complete ulcer healing (OR: 1.52, p=0.27; 95% CI: 0.72–3.21), which were extremely significant in non-placebo-controlled studies ( p<0.001). In conclusion, the significant results of CD34 + MCT might not support its therapeutic benefit due to high placebo-effect risk and considerable heterogeneity caused by distinct cell doses. More sizable double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with higher CD34 + cell dosage are needed in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: