Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study compared the effects of immediate and delayed finishing/polishing procedures on the surface characteristics (surface roughness and hardness) of tooth-coloured restoratives including a microfilled, a heavily filled and a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Eighty-four specimen discs were made for each material; the first 12 were used as controls and the remaining 72 specimens were randomly divided into two equal groups. The first group was finished/polished immediately after light polymerization and stored for 1 week in distilled water at 37 degrees C while the second group was finished/polished after 1 week storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C. Finishing and polishing was carried out using the following systems: Enhance system, white stones with Vaseline and Super-snap disks system. The finished/polished surfaces were subjected to profilometric evaluation and microhardness testing. The effects of delayed finishing/polishing procedures on surface roughness and hardness appear to be both material and technique dependent. Delayed finishing/polishing of polyacid-modified composite resins and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements generally resulted in a smoother surface. The surface roughness of composite resins after finishing/polishing procedures were generally not influenced by the finishing/polishing time. For all materials, delayed finishing/polishing with the various techniques generally resulted in a surface of similar hardness to or harder than that obtained with immediate finishing/polishing and the control group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yap et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: