Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To determine the possible changes in semen quality of Venezuelan men from 1981 to 1995, a retrospective analysis of semen volume and sperm concentrations was carried out for 2313 men from infertile couples. According to the sperm counts the sample was categorized in four groups: A, 0 sperm; B, <20 x 10(6) sperm/mL; C, 20-200 x 10(6) sperm/mL; D, 2200 x 10(6) sperm/mL. The percentage of men in each group was 9.1, 18.8, 63. 1, and 9.0%, respectively. The frequency of azoospermia and oligozoospermia (groups A and B) did not change over the last 15 years. On the contrary, the frequency showed a significant increase in group C and a decrease in group D. The range of the means of semen volume was 2.6-3.6 mL, linear regression analysis did not show a decrease in seminal fluid volume over time. The range of the means of sperm concentrations were 6.2-12.0 x 10(6) sperm/mL, 73-100 x 10(6) sperm/mL), and 230-340 sperm x 10(6)/mL in groups B, C, and D, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant reduction in the means of sperm concentrations only in group D. Excluding the azoospermic group, the analysis of pooled data (B + C + D), did not show a significant change in the means of sperm density throughout time. In the semen samples with sperm counts below 200 x 10(6)/mL the means of sperm concentration did not change in the 15-year period of observation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tortolero et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: