Objective Community-based outreach placements provide authentic clinical learning environments yet are rarely evaluated using community-derived feedback. This study assessed an intern-led chiropractic outreach placement in Rarotonga using patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and routinely collected case-mix data as complementary evaluative indicators. PREMs capture patients’ experience of the process of care and differ from patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which assess clinical or symptomatic outcomes. Methods Attending adults were invited to complete a post-visit PREM survey (n=252). Survey responses were compared with intern-recorded case-mix data (n=640; 2,453 encounters). Descriptive statistics and exploratory ordinal logistic regression examined patterns in patient experience, demographic predictors, and similarity between patient- and intern-reported information. Results Patient experience ratings were consistently high, particularly for relational domains (communication and personal manner). Tāne/male gender and symptom chronicity were associated with lower reported comfort and satisfaction. Patient- and intern-reported data showed closely similar patterns overall, suggesting good alignment in documentation practices. Conclusion PREMs data provided meaningful insight into relational aspects of care and, when combined with routine case-mix records, supported pragmatic evaluation of a community-based outreach placement. Findings highlight areas for targeted refinement in communication, expectations management, and documentation practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cade et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: