Key result
Left atrial appendage occlusion is discussed as an alternative to NOACs for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients with high bleeding risk.
Why the study?
Does left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) prevent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who are unsuitable for NOACs?
Does left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) prevent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who are unsuitable for NOACs?
This editorial discusses the role of left atrial appendage occlusion as an alternative to NOACs for stroke prevention in high-risk atrial fibrillation patients with bleeding risks.
This editorial refers to ‘Left atrial appendage occlusion in the UK; prospective registry and data linkage to hospital episodes statistics, by I. Willits et al. 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab042. Ischaemic stroke remains the most feared complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the widespread success of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) at mitigating this risk, significant subsets of patients find them unsuitable due to the associated bleeding risk. In this context, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) or excision appears to offer an exciting alternative.1,2 Randomized trials have reported an equivalence of LAAO implantation with NOACs at stroke prevention in high-risk patients, and recent surgical data strongly support a mechanistic benefit in closing off the left atrial appendage and thereby preventing clot formation. Many patients would prefer to be ‘off medication’: a permeant, device-based solution is certainly appealing compared with lifelong daily tablets. However, the application of this technology is limited by an...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanthasamy et al. (2021) conducted an editorial in Atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) vs. NOACs was evaluated. Left atrial appendage occlusion is discussed as an alternative to NOACs for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients with high bleeding risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: