Key result
Hypocalcemic arresting solution reduces MVO2 ~15% vs hyperkalemic solution in isolated rat hearts.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether myocardial oxygen consumption differs between hearts arrested by hyperkalemic versus hypocalcemic solutions at constant coronary flow.
Does hypocalcemic arresting solution reduce myocardial oxygen consumption compared to hyperkalemic arresting solution in isolated rat hearts?
Population
12 isolated Langendorff-perfused rat hearts
Comparison
Hypocalcemic arresting solution (5 mM K+, 0.08 mM Ca2+) vs hyperkalemic arresting solution (20 mM K+, 1.5 mM Ca2+)
Design
Experimental study measuring MVO2 with alternating perfusion solutions
Authors
Loading...
Hypocalcemic arrest may lower myocardial energy use during cardioplegia; leaves open whether this improves clinical outcomes versus hyperkalemic solutions.
Does hypocalcemic arresting solution reduce myocardial oxygen consumption compared to hyperkalemic arresting solution in isolated rat hearts?
Mean Difference: -0.004
p-value: p=<0.01
Hypocalcemic arrest reduces myocardial oxygen consumption by 15% compared to hyperkalemic arrest in isolated rat hearts.
Burkhoff et al. (1990) studied Cardiac arrest (experimental) (n=18). Hypocalcemic arresting solution (ASCa) vs. Hyperkalemic arresting solution (ASK) was evaluated on Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) (MD -0.004 ml.min-1.g-1, p=<0.01). In isolated rat hearts, hypocalcemic arresting solution reduced myocardial oxygen consumption by 15% (0.004 ml.min-1.g-1) compared to hyperkalemic arresting solution (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: