Key result
Aging over ~6 years is linked to reduced fasting and glucose-stimulated GLP-1 and GIP.
Why the study?
It is not known whether GLP-1 and GIP levels correlate within individuals over time or whether these levels change with age, as previous studies were cross-sectional.
Do fasting and glucose-stimulated GLP-1 and GIP levels change longitudinally over time in healthy older subjects?
Observational (n=41)
Do fasting and glucose-stimulated GLP-1 and GIP levels change longitudinally over time in healthy older subjects?
Aging is associated with longitudinal reductions in fasting and glucose-stimulated GLP-1 and fasting GIP, which may predispose older adults to glucose intolerance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May impair glucose homeostasis in older adults; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before guiding therapy.
CONTEXT: It is not known whether glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) levels correlate within individuals, nor whether levels change with age. Previous studies have all been cross-sectional in design. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate longitudinal changes in fasting and glucose-stimulated incretin hormone concentrations in healthy older subjects. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: Forty-one healthy older subjects had measurements of plasma GLP-1 and GIP while fasting and after a 75-g oral glucose load on two occasions separated by 5.9 ± 0.1 years [mean age at the initial study: 71.2 ± 3.8 (SD) years]. Breath samples were collected to calculate the gastric 50% emptying time (T50). RESULTS: For GLP-1, both fasting concentrations (P < 0.001) and area under the curve 0 to 120 minutes (P = 0.001) were decreased at followup. Fasting GIP was also lower (P = 0.03) at follow up, but there was no change in the area under the curve 0 to 120 minutes (P = 0.26). The gastric emptying T50 was slower at followup (P = 0.008). Neither the change in T50 nor the body mass index at the initial study was a determinant of the change in incretin responses. Between the two study days, fasting GIP (r = 0.72, P < 0.001) correlated well, but not fasting GLP-1 (r = 0.23, P = 0.18). However, both glucose-stimulated GLP-1 (r = 0.50, P = 0.002) and GIP (r = 0.60, P < 0.001) showed correlations between the initial and follow-up studies. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting GIP and glucose-stimulated GLP-1 and GIP concentrations correlate within individuals over a follow-up period of ∼5.9 years. Aging is associated with reductions in fasting GLP-1 and GIP, and glucose-stimulated GLP-1, which may predispose to the development of glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=41). Aging vs. Baseline was evaluated on Fasting GLP-1 concentrations (p=<0.001). Aging over 5.9 years in healthy older subjects was associated with significant reductions in fasting GLP-1 (P<0.001) and GIP (P=0.03), and glucose-stimulated GLP-1 (P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: