Key result
Non-chronic potassium binder treatment (MPR <80%) was associated with a significantly higher risk of hospitalization (HR 1.41), recurrent hyperkalemia, and renal decline compared to chronic treatment.
Why the study?
Does chronic potassium binder treatment reduce adverse clinical outcomes compared to temporary treatment in patients with hyperkalemia?
Cohort (n=4,321)
Yes
Does chronic potassium binder treatment reduce adverse clinical outcomes compared to temporary treatment in patients with hyperkalemia?
Hazard Ratio: 1.41 (95% CI 1.294–1.535)
Absolute Event Rate: 73.2% vs 58.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Chronic continuation of potassium binders in patients with hyperkalemia is associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization, renal replacement therapy, and recurrent hyperkalemia compared to temporary treatment.
Chronic PB adherence was associated with lower hospitalization and RRT risks in HK; leaves open whether RCTs will confirm benefit over intermittent therapy.
Introduction: Hyperkalemia (HK) is a common disorder in patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease, and potassium binders (PBs) are recommended to control serum potassium (S-K) levels. Although HK is often a chronic condition, short-term and intermittent PBs treatment has been largely applied to control S-K levels, and little is known about the impact of long-term and chronic PBs treatment on clinical outcomes. Method: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a Japanese claims database (April 2008–September 2018). HK was defined as at least two S-K ≥5.1 mmol/L within a 12-month(M) interval. The index date was defined as the initial PB prescription date, and the S-K values were examined at 3M, 6M, and 12M after the index. The medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to evaluate the length of the prescribed period of PB, as prescription refill was not allowed in Japan. Clinical outcomes were analyzed by comparing MPR <80% to MPR ≥80% using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: We found 4,321 patients with HK and were on initial PB treatments, and 993 and 3,328 patients were categorized in the MPR <80% and MPR ≥80% groups, respectively. The mean prescription days ±SD in the MPR <80% and MPR ≥80% groups were 114.7 ± 9.1 and 1151.2 ± 22.5, respectively. S-K value with adjustment by covariates in MPR <80% and MPR ≥80% groups were 5.62 (95% CI: 5.57–5.68) and 5.72 (95% CI: 5.68–5.76) at index followed by 4.65 (95% CI: 4.58–4.71) and 4.57 (95% CI: 4.51–4.62) at 3M, respectively. The hazard ratios of incidence rates in hospitalization was 1.41 ( p < 0.001), introduction of renal replacement therapy was 1.25 ( p < 0.003), recurrent HK was 1.67 ( p < 0.001), and decreased eGFR was 1.41 ( p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: These results indicate a higher risk of adverse outcomes when PBs were not prescribed chronically, whereas S-K levels were similarly controlled. Chronic control with continued PBs rather than temporary treatment may be associated with the reduction of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with HK.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanda et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Hyperkalemia (n=4,321). Non-chronic potassium binder treatment (Medication Possession Ratio <80%) vs. Chronic potassium binder treatment (Medication Possession Ratio ≥80%) was evaluated on Hospitalization for any reason (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.294-1.535, p=<0.001). Non-chronic potassium binder treatment (MPR <80%) was associated with a significantly higher risk of hospitalization (HR 1.41), recurrent hyperkalemia, and renal decline compared to chronic treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: