Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tertiary folding of the 160-nt P4-P6 domain of the Tetrahymena group I intron RNA involves burying of substantial surface area, providing a model for the folding of other large RNA domains involved in catalysis. Stopped-flow fluorescence was used to monitor the Mg2+-induced tertiary folding of pyrene-labeled P4-P6. At 35 degrees C with [Mg2+] approximately 10 mM, P4-P6 folds on the tens of milliseconds timescale with k(obs) = 15-31 s(-1). From these values, an activation free energy deltaG(double dagger) of approximately 8-16 kcal/mol is calculated, where the large range for deltaG(double dagger) arises from uncertainty in the pre-exponential factor relating k(obs) and delta G(double dagger). The folding rates of six mutant P4-P6 RNAs were measured and found to be similar to that of the wild-type RNA, in spite of significant thermodynamic destabilization or stabilization. The ratios of the kinetic and thermodynamic free energy changes phi = delta deltaG(double dagger)/delta deltaG(o') are approximately 0, implying a folding transition state in which most of the native-state tertiary contacts are not yet formed (an early folding transition state). The k(obs) depends on the Mg2+ concentration, and the initial slope of k(obs) versus [Mg2+] suggests that only approximately 1 Mg2+ ion is bound in the rate-limiting folding step. This is consistent with an early folding transition state, because folded P4-P6 binds many Mg2+ ions. The observation of a substantial deltaG(double dagger) despite an early folding transition state suggests that a simple two-state folding diagram for Mg2+-induced P4-P6 folding is incomplete. Our kinetic data are some of the first to provide quantitative values for an activation barrier and location of a transition state for tertiary folding of an RNA domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silverman et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: