Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Porosity and permeability are key controls on hydrothermal circulation and alteration in magmatically heated upper oceanic crust. However, the hydraulic properties of basalts altered above 200°C are largely unknown, leaving their role in high‐temperature systems unclear. Here, we assess rock‐matrix porosities and permeabilities of pervasively altered MORB‐like basalts from outcrops in the sheeted dikes and axial lavas of the Semail ophiolite, Oman. The samples represent regional spilite alteration (chlorite–albite–quartz ± actinolite; 150–440°C) and localized epidosite alteration (epidote–quartz; 255–435°C). Porosity and permeability of spilitized rocks vary as follows: interpillow hyaloclastites (14–27 vol.%, 10−17–10−15 m2) > pillow cores (4–12 vol.%; ∼10−19–6 × 10−18 m2) > pillow rims (4–11 vol.%; ∼10−19–2 × 10−18 m2) > massive sheet flows (1–9 vol.%; ∼10−19 m2) ≥ dikes (1–5 vol.%; ∼10−19 m2). Pillow values fall within the ranges of existing data on fresh and low‐temperature altered basalts in in situ crust. However, hyaloclastite permeabilities are 1–4 orders of magnitude higher and are clearly preferred flow paths. Epidosites have elevated porosity and permeability irrespective of rock morphology (18–26 vol.%; ∼10−16–10−14 m2). Pillow stacks have upscaled (∼104 m3) matrix porosities and permeabilities of ∼9 vol.% and ∼10−17–10−16 m2 when spilitized and 16 vol.% and up to ∼10−14 m2 when epidotized. Upscaled permeabilities of spilites meet minimum requirements for observed heat and fluid discharge from high‐temperature seafloor systems even without fracture networks, and reflect strong flow through the rock‐matrix.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brett‐Adams et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: