The insertion of HOCH 2 C⋮CH (ha) into the Ru−C bond of Ru II (RL 1 )(PPh 3 ) 2 (CO)Cl, 1, has afforded Ru II (RL 3 )(PPh 3 ) 2 (CO)Cl, 3, which has been structurally characterized. Insertion rates in CH 2 Cl 2 −MeOH for ha as well as for PhC⋮CH (pa), which inserts similarly into 1 affording Ru II (RL 2 )(PPh 3 ) 2 (CO)Cl, 2, are proportional to the product of the concentrations of alkyne and methanol. The insertion rate of ha is nearly 5 times faster than that of pa, and for a given alkyne the rate increases as R becomes more electron-withdrawing (OMe < Me < Cl). A reaction model implicating the adduct 1 ·MeOH, which binds and activates the alkyne via displacement of MeOH, is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: