Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 8, 2021Perspectives in Clinical ResearchOpen Access

Has mandatory prospective registration of all studies brought about a change? A 1-year audit of studies registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI before and after April 1, 2018

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

NSNaman S. ShettyHeart Failure / CardiomyopathyUTUrmilaM ThatteKing Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical CollegeNGNithya GogtayKing Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Shetty et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6ab1f4234d362ee307c08e78https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_89_20
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prospective registration trends, reasons for retrospective registration and mechanisms to increase prospective registration compliance: descriptive analysis and survey2018 · 60 citations
  2. 2An audit of studies registered retrospectively with the Clinical Trials Registry of India: A one year analysis2019 · 8 citations
  3. 3Challenges in Administering a Clinical Trials Registry: Lessons from the Clinical Trials Registry-India2013 · 22 citations
  4. 4Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors2004 · 1,252 citations
  5. 5Registering Clinical Trials2003 · 522 citations