Key result
Return-to-play cTn screening post-SARS-CoV-2 shows limited diagnostic utility for detecting myocardial involvement in athletes.
Why the study?
Initial return to play cardiac testing protocols in young competitive athletes following SARS-CoV-2 infection recommended cardiac troponin to screen for cardiac involvement, but its diagnostic yield was unclear.
Does routine cardiac troponin testing accurately detect SARS-CoV-2 myocardial involvement in young competitive athletes returning to play?
Cohort (n=3,184)
Yes
Does routine cardiac troponin testing accurately detect SARS-CoV-2 myocardial involvement in young competitive athletes returning to play?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.1% vs 0.6%
Routine cardiac troponin testing has limited diagnostic utility for detecting SARS-CoV-2 myocardial involvement in competitive athletes returning to play.
Troponin screening warrants caution in athletes post-SARS-CoV-2 due to low sensitivity; hypothesis-generating for optimal return-to-play protocols.
Background Initial protocols for return to play cardiac testing in young competitive athletes following SARS-CoV-2 infection recommended cardiac troponin (cTn) to screen for cardiac involvement. This study aimed to define the diagnostic yield of cTn in athletes undergoing cardiovascular testing following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods and Results This prospective, observational cohort study from ORCCA (Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Conditions in Athletes) included collegiate athletes who underwent cTn testing as a component of return to play protocols following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The cTn values were stratified as undetectable, detectable but within normal limits, and abnormal (>99% percentile). The presence of probable or definite SARS-CoV-2 myocardial involvement was compared between those with normal versus abnormal cTn levels. A total of 3184/3685 (86%) athletes in the ORCCA database met the inclusion criteria for this study (age 20±1 years, 32% female athletes, 28% Black race). The median time from SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis to cTn testing was 13 days (interquartile range, 11, 18 days). The cTn levels were undetectable in 2942 athletes (92%), detectable but within normal limits in 210 athletes (7%), and abnormal in 32 athletes (1%). Of the 32 athletes with abnormal cTn testing, 19/32 (59%) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, 30/32 (94%) underwent transthoracic echocardiography, and 1/32 (3%) did not have cardiac imaging. One athlete with abnormal troponin met the criteria for definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 myocardial involvement. In the total cohort, 21/3184 (0.7%) had SARS-CoV-2 myocardial involvement, among whom 20/21 (95%) had normal troponin testing. Conclusions Abnormal cTn during routine return to play cardiac screening among competitive athletes following SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to have limited diagnostic utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moulson et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=3,184). Abnormal cardiac troponin (cTn) levels vs. Normal cardiac troponin levels was evaluated on Probable or definite SARS-CoV-2 myocardial involvement. Abnormal cardiac troponin during return-to-play screening following SARS-CoV-2 infection had limited diagnostic utility, identifying only 1 of 21 athletes with myocardial involvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: