Key result
Municipal health services fail to reduce 1-year post-AMI mortality after adjusting for patient characteristics.
Why the study?
There is a paucity of research based on representative data investigating the effects of area-level health services on mortality after acute myocardial infarction.
Do municipal health services reduce all-cause and CVD mortality in adults discharged alive after acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=9,412)
Yes
Do municipal health services reduce all-cause and CVD mortality in adults discharged alive after acute myocardial infarction?
Variation in mortality following AMI across municipalities in Norway is driven by patient characteristics rather than differences in municipal health service levels.
Municipal health services should not yet inform post-AMI care decisions; hypothesis-generating for patient characteristics driving mortality variation and requires prospective study.
OBJECTIVES: Studies link area features such as neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation to poor health outcomes. However, there is a paucity of research based on representative data investigating the effects of area-level health services on mortality. This study examines the extent to which municipal health services account for municipal variation in all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. We hypothesise that unfavourable municipal features (eg, fewer available places for rehabilitation) are associated with higher risk of mortality after accounting for patients' characteristics. DESIGN: Population data from Norwegian national/municipal registrars are analysed using multilevel logistic regression in this prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The analytic sample (9412 patients aged 18+ from 336 municipalities) constitutes 87.7% of the nationwide population of Norwegian adults who were hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 2009 and discharged alive. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause and CVD mortality occurring within 365 days after the first day of hospitalisation for AMI. RESULTS: There was a small but significant variation at the municipal level in all-cause mortality (0.5%; intraclass correlation coefficient=0.005) but not CVD mortality. There were no significant fixed effects of municipal health services on mortality in bivariate models. Patients' characteristics (eg, gender, comorbidities) fully accounted for the observed municipal variation in mortality. Being male versus female (OR=1.21, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.43), or having been previously diagnosed with dementia versus not (OR=2.06, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.77) were also linked to higher odds of death. CONCLUSIONS: Municipal variation in all-cause mortality for Norwegian patients with AMI appears to be driven not by differences across municipalities in health service levels, but by differences across municipalities in the composition of patients. Focusing on chronic disease prevention and treatment, and tackling personal and structural risk factors embedded within patients' sociodemographic characteristics, may be especially beneficial for longevity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambugo et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in acute myocardial infarction (n=9,412). Municipal health services was evaluated on All-cause and CVD mortality occurring within 365 days after the first day of hospitalisation for AMI. Municipal health services had no significant effect on 1-year mortality after AMI; the small municipal variation in all-cause mortality (0.5%) was fully explained by patient characteristics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: