Key result
Different apixaban lead-in strategies yield similar rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding.
Why the study?
Clinicians use different apixaban lead-in regimens for hospitalized adults with VTE, but the comparative safety and effectiveness of these strategies are unclear.
Do different apixaban lead-in dosing strategies (with or without parenteral anticoagulation) affect the incidence of recurrent VTE or bleeding events in hospitalized adults with newly diagnosed VTE?
Observational (n=68)
Do different apixaban lead-in dosing strategies (with or without parenteral anticoagulation) affect the incidence of recurrent VTE or bleeding events in hospitalized adults with newly diagnosed VTE?
p-value: p=0.99
Different apixaban lead-in dosing strategies, including those with parenteral lead-in, demonstrated similar safety and effectiveness in hospitalized patients with newly diagnosed VTE.
Comparable outcomes across regimens support individualized lead-in choices in hospitalized VTE; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Background: Clinicians often use parenteral lead-in regimens prior to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients due to shorter half-life and the ability to use laboratory monitoring. Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of different apixaban lead-in durations for hospitalized adults with newly diagnosed VTE. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with one of the following lead-in regimens: (1) parenteral anticoagulation ≥ 48 hours with abbreviated course of apixaban lead-in, (2) parenteral anticoagulation ≥ 48 hours with full apixaban lead-in, or (3) no parenteral anticoagulation with full apixaban lead-in. All followed by maintenance apixaban for at least 6 months. Primary outcomes were incidences of recurrent VTE (rVTE) or bleeding events, in accordance with International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) definitions, within 6 months of the index visit. Data are presented descriptively and univariate analyses between groups performed. Results: Sixty-eight patients were included; rVTE (all deep vein thrombosis (DVT)) occurred in 2 patients (2.9%) and bleeding events (all clinically relevant non-major bleeding) occurred in 3 patients (4.4%) overall. There were no differences between groups; one patient in the parenteral group had full lead-in and one patient in the full-lead apixaban group had rVTE. One patient in the parenteral with full lead-in and 2 patients in the full lead-in apixaban group had a bleeding event ( P = 0.99). Mean time to rVTE or bleeding event was 46 and 158 days, respectively. Conclusions: Similar safety and effectiveness were noted between the 3 apixaban lead-in regimens. These findings suggest that all 3 regimens provide similar outcomes, warranting further investigation to optimize lead-in strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spencer et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Venous thromboembolism (n=68). Apixaban lead-in dosing strategies vs. Different lead-in regimens was evaluated on Incidences of recurrent VTE or bleeding events within 6 months (p=0.99). Apixaban lead-in dosing strategies in hospitalized adults with VTE resulted in similar overall rates of recurrent VTE (2.9%) and bleeding events (4.4%) at 6 months across three regimens (P=0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: