Key result
Endurance-trained males show a ~0.5 L/min drop in postexercise cardiac output versus untrained males.
Why the study?
The mechanisms explaining divergent postexercise hypotension hemodynamic responses between endurance-trained and nonendurance-trained males remain unknown.
Does greater fluid loss explain the divergent postexercise reduction in cardiac output observed in endurance-trained compared to untrained males?
Observational (n=24)
Does greater fluid loss explain the divergent postexercise reduction in cardiac output observed in endurance-trained compared to untrained males?
Greater exercise-induced fluid loss does not fully explain the postexercise reduction in cardiac output observed in endurance-trained men compared to untrained men.
Fluid loss does not explain postexercise cardiac output decline in trained males; hypothesis-generating for non-dehydration mechanisms.
Following exercise, mean arterial pressure (MAP) is reduced ~5–10 mmHg from preexercise baseline. In nonendurance-trained males, postexercise hypotension results from peripheral vasodilation not offset by increased cardiac output (CO). By contrast, postexercise hypotension occurs through a reduction in CO from preexercise baseline in endurance-trained males. The reason(s) explaining these divergent responses remain unknown. Exercise at fixed percentage of peak oxygen consumption (V̇o2peak) is associated with a greater rate of metabolic heat production in trained individuals and therefore elevated sweat rates, both when compared with untrained individuals. We hypothesized that greater fluid loss would explain the postexercise reduction in CO of endurance-trained males. Twelve endurance-trained males (Trained: V̇o2peak, 64 ± 5 ml O2·kg−1·min−1) cycled for 60 min at 60% V̇o2peak (Trained60%). On separate days, 12 nonendurance trained males (Untrained: V̇o2peak, 49 ± 3 ml O2·kg−1·min−1) cycled at 1) 60% V̇o2peak (Untrained60%), and 2) a rate of heat production equivalent to that achieved by the Trained group (UntrainedMatched). Fluid loss was similar between Trained60% (−1.32 ± 0.20 kg) and UntrainedMatched (−1.32 ± 0.23 kg; P = 0.99) but was greater in these conditions relative to Untrained60% (−0.95 ± 0.11 kg; both P < 0.01). During the final 30 min of postexercise supine recovery, MAP was similarly reduced by 5 ± 2 mmHg in all three conditions ( P = 0.91). The reduction in MAP was mediated by a 0.5 ± 0.3 l/min reduction in CO from baseline in Trained60% ( P = 0.01). In contrast, CO returned to baseline following exercise during UntrainedMatched and Untrained60% (both P ≥ 0.30). These data demonstrate that greater fluid loss does not fully explain the divergent postexercise hemodynamic responses observed in trained relative to untrained males. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Even when matched for exercise-induced fluid loss, cardiac output was decreased in trained males but returned to baseline following exercise in their untrained counterparts. However, as per our hypothesis, reductions in stroke volume were similar between groups. This suggests that exercise-induced fluid loss is an important determinant of the stroke volume response during recovery but factors affecting heart rate such as exercise intensity and/or heat stress are also important determinants of postexercise hemodynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meade et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Postexercise hypotension (n=24). Endurance training status vs. Nonendurance-trained status was evaluated on Reduction in cardiac output from baseline during postexercise recovery (p=0.01). Even when matched for exercise-induced fluid loss, cardiac output decreased by 0.5 ± 0.3 L/min in endurance-trained males (P=0.01) but returned to baseline in untrained males.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: