OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of single- vs. multiple-dilator techniques in the performance of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING: Intensive care units at a level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Fifty consecutive patients requiring tracheostomy for airway control or prolonged mechanical ventilatory support. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive a percutaneous dilational tracheostomy by either the single- or multiple-dilator technique described by Ciaglia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy was performed using the single-dilator technique in 6:01 +/- 3:03 mins and by the multiple-dilator technique in 10:01 +/- 4:26 mins (p <.0006). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the two techniques. No major complications occurred with either technique. CONCLUSION: The single-dilator percutaneous tracheostomy technique is a safe, cost-effective, and more rapidly performed method for bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: