Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The m-hydroxy analogues of allylprodine and related structures have been synthesized and tested for narcotic agonist and antagonist activity on the electrically stimulated guinea pig ileum and by the hot-plate procedure in mice. It has been found that m-hydroxyallylprodine (alpha-2) is neither an agonist nor antagonist. Other phenolic congeners similarly have little or no activity. The fact that these results are in dramatic contrast with the structure-activity profile of morphine and closely related opiates has led to the proposal that the interaction of morphine and allylprodine (alpha-1) with the mu opioid receptor differs. This difference is postulated to arise from the recognition of the aromatic groups of morphine and alpha-1 by different aromatic-binding subsites of the receptor. These subsites are suggested to be identical with those which recognize the aromatic rings of the Tyr1 and Phe4 of the enkephalins and endorphins. A receptor model consistent with these results is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Portoghese et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: