Sensitivity of forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the vital capacity (FEF25-75) in detecting airway obstruction was investigated in 14 children with mild-moderate asthma, allergic to house dust mites, while at high altitude (1756 m). Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), FEF25-75, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured every 2 weeks for 12 weeks (total, 84 measurements). The presence or absence of wheezing at the chest auscultation was ascertained before each test. During the study period, a significant improvement of both mean (SD) FEF25-75 [61 (12)% vs. 68 (11)% of the predicted value, p = 0.005] and PEF [95 (16)% vs. 103 (13)%, p = 0.002] was observed. FEV1 changed only marginally [82 (7)% vs. 86 (6)%, p = 0.05]. Wheezing was present on 12/84 occasions. Wheezing was associated with abnormal FEF25-75 values on most occasions but not with abnormal FEV1 or PEF. FEF25-75 was decreased on 51% of days in which wheezing was absent. FEV1 and PEF were, respectively, normal in 69% (p < 0.0001) and 92% (p < 0.0001) of measurements in which FEF25-75 was abnormal. These results suggest that FEF25-75 may be considered a good indicator of airflow obstruction and a sensitive marker of respiratory improvement in asthmatic children during reduced antigen exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valletta et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: