Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) display pro-angiogenic properties that confer to them a therapeutic potential for treating ischemic lesions. In culture, EPCs generate Endothelial Colony Forming Cells (ECFCs) that have endothelial features but still retain properties of stem/progenitor cells. EPCs can be obtained either from cord blood (CB) or adult blood (AB). For clinical perspectives, both CB-ECFCs and AB-ECFCs have advantages and inconveniences. On one hand, CB-ECFCs are allogenic, with potential immune rejection, but are more clonogenic, proliferative and angiogenic than AB-ECFCs. We have found that these cells display high inter-individual variation in terms of clonogenic profile. Low clonogenic CB-ECFCs had functional properties similar to those of AB-ECFCs. Conversely, a high initial clonogenicity was associated to an enhanced proliferation, angiogenic potential and to an increased expression of genes linked to stem cell-ness. Selecting CB-ECFCs according the initial clonogenicity represent a relevant marker of their potential efficacy on vascular repair. On the other hand, AB-ECFCs are autologous, and should be immunologically well tolerated, but these cells give rise to only few colonies, proliferate less and are less angiogenic than CB-ECFCs. In order to go further in CB-/AB- characterization, we have analyzed the mechanisms of AB-ECFC premature senescence, and shown that GDF15 had pivotal role in this context. Taken together, these new data constitute important steps toward clinical use of EPCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ha et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: