This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study shows the ability of 3 standard endoscopic instruments to access the length of the intramedullary canal through a technique that we have termed "medulloscopy." Cadaveric studies were performed to determine the dimensions of the proximal tibia and the relative abilities of a knee arthroscope, a hip arthroscope, and a flexible rhinolaryngoscope to visualize the length of the intramedullary canal of the tibia. The 3 endoscopes were able to access the length of the intramedullary canal in the following proportions: 19.1% +/- 1.0% for the knee arthroscope, 29.1% +/- 3.8% for the hip arthroscope, and 84.1% +/- 1.8% for the flexible scope (P <.05). The proximal aspect of the intramedullary canal of the tibia can be visualized with standard knee and hip arthroscopic equipment. A flexible rhinolaryngoscope was required to access the distal tibia. Further studies are needed to determine the specific indications for intramedullary arthroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberts et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: