Risk‐averse farmers in the produce industry grow a product whose market price is often quite unpredictable. Shippers or other intermediaries shield the farmer from much of this price risk; however, actual contracts between growers and shippers vary considerably across commodities in the residual price risk growers face. We hypothesize that imperfect quality measurement results in a moral hazard problem, and that price provides additional information regarding quality. As a consequence, an efficient contract does not shield growers from all idiosyncratic price risk. We examine this hypothesis for the case of fresh‐market tomatoes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hueth et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: