Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The humidity outputs of the Bain circuit, a traditional non-coaxial Mapleson D system, and a circle system with and without a soda lime absorber were evaluated in a laboratory model simulating a 70-kg subject. The breathing systems were tested with tidal volumes of 0.35 and 0.70 L and frequencies of 10-20 breaths/min to maintain an end-expiratory CO2 of 4.5%. There were small differences in inspiratory gas humidity between the Bain and the non-coaxial Mapleson D system. With a fresh gas flow of 5 L/min in the Bain circuit, the humidity was 9.8-16.5 mg H2O/L depending on tidal volume and respiratory frequency. The humidity output of the circle absorber system with fresh gas flows of 0.5 or 2 L/min was 21.6-25.2 mg H2O/L at 60 min. Therefore, this study does not support previous studies, which propose that the Bain circuit has superior humidifying properties compared with those of the circle absorber system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bengtson et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: