Key result
Acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy was highly prevalent, with incidence ranging from 4% to 98% across studies, and moderate to severe toxicities were common in patients receiving doses >85 mg/m2.
Systematic Review (n=6,211)
Acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy is highly prevalent during the first cycle of treatment, highlighting a significant need for standardized assessment and reporting to inform preventive guidelines.
High prevalence of acute oxaliplatin neuropathy warrants close monitoring from cycle one, especially at doses >85 mg/m²; reinforces need for standardized assessment to guide prevention.
Although acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy (OXIPN) is frequently regarded to be transient, recent studies have reported prolongation of infusion times, dose reduction and treatment cessation following the first dose of oxaliplatin in quarter of patients. Acute OXIPN is also a well-established risk factor for chronic neuropathy. However, there is underreporting of these parameters during the acute phase (≤ 14 days). This paper systematically reviews the incidence of acute OXIPN and its impact on treatment in the first cycle. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Medline. Published original articles were included if they described details about prevalence of oxaliplatin-induced acute neuropathy. Fourteen studies, comprised of 6211 patients were evaluated. The majority of patients were treated with oxaliplatin in combination with leucovorin and fluorouracil (FOLFOX). Most studies used the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria to assess acute neuropathy. Acute neuropathy (Grades 1–4) was the most common event with prevalence ranging from 4–98%, followed by haematological (1.4–81%) and gastrointestinal (1.2–67%) toxicities, respectively. Drug regimens, starting dose of oxaliplatin and neuropathy assessment tools varied across studies. In addition, moderate to severe toxicities were common in patients that received a large dose of oxaliplatin (> 85 mg/m 2 ) and/ or combined drugs. The majority of studies did not report the factors affecting acute neuropathy namely the range (minimal) doses required to evoke acute neuropathy, patient and clinical risk factors. In addition, there was no systematic reporting of the number of patients subjected to prolonged infusion, dose reduction, treatment delay and treatment cessation during the acute phase. Despite the heterogeneity of studies regarding oxaliplatin starting dose, drug regimen, neuropathy assessment tools and study design, a large number of patients developed acute neuropathy. To develop a better preventive and therapeutic guideline for acute/chronic neuropathy, a prospective study should be conducted in a large cohort of patients in relation to drug regimen, starting/ranges (minimal) of doses producing acute neuropathy, treatment compliance, patient and clinical risk factors using a standardised neuropathy assessment tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gebremedhn et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review in Colorectal cancer (n=6,211). Oxaliplatin was evaluated on Incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. Acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy was highly prevalent, with incidence ranging from 4% to 98% across studies, and moderate to severe toxicities were common in patients receiving doses >85 mg/m2.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: