PURPOSE: To evaluate the consistency prior to the setting of 5 elastomeric interocclusal recording materials in comparison with a wax and a zinc oxide-eugenol paste. This property is related to the viscosity as well as to the working and setting times of these materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Testing of consistency was performed following a modification of the method described in ADA Specification No. 19, for elastomeric impression materials. Each one of the tested materials was mixed for 20 seconds and was then loaded into a 0.5 mL syringe. The material was syringed onto a 10 x 10 x 0.5 cm glass plate. A second 575 g glass plate was placed on top of the unset interocclusal registration material. A total of 10 samples were tested for each material. The surface area covered by the materials was measured with the help of a scanner and the use of appropriate computer software. RESULTS: One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences among the materials (F = 889.493, p < 0.0005). According to Tukey's honest significant difference test, all materials were significantly different (p < 0.05) from one another. All polyvinylsiloxanes occupied a smaller area than that of the polyether and of the zinc oxide-eugenol paste. CONCLUSIONS: Zinc oxide-eugenol paste was the most fluid of all materials tested. Polyvinylsiloxanes displayed less flow properties than polyether.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michalakis et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: