Key result
The Gradient Boosting Decision Tree algorithm predicted peripheral vestibular dysfunction from posturography data with an AUC of 0.90, significantly outperforming traditional logistic regression.
Why the study?
Do machine learning algorithms applied to posturography data accurately predict peripheral vestibular dysfunction compared to logistic regression?
Case-Control (n=238)
No
Do machine learning algorithms applied to posturography data accurately predict peripheral vestibular dysfunction compared to logistic regression?
Machine learning algorithms, particularly Gradient Boosting Decision Trees, can accurately predict peripheral vestibular dysfunction using posturography data.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid vestibular assessment in research settings; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objective: To evaluate various machine learning algorithms in predicting peripheral vestibular dysfunction using the dataset of the center of pressure (COP) sway during foam posturography measured from patients with dizziness. Study Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: 75 patients with vestibular dysfunction and 163 healthy controls were retrospectively recruited. The dataset included the velocity, the envelopment area, the power spectrum of the COP for three frequency ranges and the presence of peripheral vestibular dysfunction evaluated by caloric testing in 75 patients with vestibular dysfunction and 163 healthy controls. Main Outcome Measures: Various forms of machine learning algorithms including the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, Bagging Classifier and Logistic Regression were trained. Validation and comparison were performed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the recall of each algorithm using K-fold cross-validation. Results: The AUC (0.90 ± 0.06) and the recall (0.84 ± 0.07) of the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree were the highest among the algorithms tested, and both of them were significantly higher than those of the logistic regression (AUC: 0.85 ± 0.08, recall: 0.78 ± 0.07). The recall of the Bagging Classifier (0.82 ± 0.07) was also significantly higher than that of logistic regression. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms can be successfully used to predict vestibular dysfunction as identified using caloric testing with the dataset of the COP sway during posturography. The multiple algorithms should be evaluated in each clinical dataset since specific algorithm does not always fit to any dataset. Optimization of the hyperparameters in each algorithm are necessary to obtain the highest accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamogashira et al. (2020) conducted a case-control in Peripheral vestibular dysfunction (n=238). Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (Machine Learning) vs. Logistic Regression was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting vestibular dysfunction (p=<0.05). The Gradient Boosting Decision Tree algorithm predicted peripheral vestibular dysfunction from posturography data with an AUC of 0.90, significantly outperforming traditional logistic regression.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: