A recent article by J. I. Yano has indicated that there is an inconsistency in the original formulation of the quasi-equilibrium theory of Arakawa and Schubert. He argues that this inconsistency results from a contradiction in the two asymptotic limits of the theory; that is, the fractional area covered by convection, and the ratio of the convective adjustment and large-scale timescales cannot simultaneously go to zero, σ → 0 and τADJ/τLS → 0. Yano cites the heat engine theory proposed by Rennó and Ingersoll as “formally establishing” this contradiction. It is demonstrated in this paper that the quasi-equilibrium framework originally developed by Arakawa and Schubert is perfectly consistent with the heat engine theory for steady-state convection, that is, when the timescale associated with the large-scale forcing τLS approximates the effective adjustment timescale of the large-scale ensemble of convective clouds τEFF. Indeed, the quasi-equilibrium framework states that, on the large scale, the atmosphere is in quasi steady state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: