High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Modified Ni-Al 2 O 3 catalysts with Ca, Co, and Ce species as promoters were prepared by the combustion method, and the structure, morphology, reduction characteristic, and CO 2 –CH 4 reforming of the catalysts were discussed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), H 2 -temperature-programmed reduction (H 2 -TPR), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping, NH 3 -temperature-programmed desorption (NH 3 -TPD), N 2 adsorption–desorption, thermogravimetric-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTG), and temperature-programmed hydrogenation (TPH) methods. The crystal size of Ni on Ca-Ni-Al 2 O 3 was 16.97 nm, and the active component and additive were distributed well in the catalyst. Co-Ni-Al 2 O 3 presented a surface area of 65.70 m 2 ·g –1 and a pore diameter of 161.60 nm. Ce-Ni-Al 2 O 3 showed relatively stable nickel–aluminum spinel (NiAl 2 O 4 ), which could not be easily reduced to the active component Ni. Evaluation results demonstrated that the performance of the catalysts followed the order Co-Ni-Al 2 O 3 > Ca-Ni-Al 2 O 3 > Ni-Al 2 O 3 > Ce-Ni-Al 2 O 3 . Carbon deposition analysis showed that the carbon resistance of Ca-Ni-Al 2 O 3 was poor and graphitic carbon was generated on the catalyst. However, Ce-Ni-Al 2 O 3 showed less carbon deposition, which might have resulted from the lower activity of the catalyst.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: