Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection, the isolated expression of the viral immediate-early protein 2 (IE2) 86 kDa regulatory protein coincides with an up-regulation of cyclin E gene expression, both in fibroblasts and U373 cells. Since IE2 also interferes with cell-cycle progression, it is unclear whether IE2 is a genuine activator of cyclin E or whether IE2-arrested cells contain elevated levels of cyclin E primarily as a consequence of them being arrested at the beginning of S phase. It is important to distinguish between these possibilities in order to define and analyse at a mechanistic level the proliferative and anti-proliferative capacities of IE2. Here we have shown that IE2 can activate cyclin E independent of the cell-cycle state and can therefore function as a genuine activator of cyclin E gene expression. A mutant of IE2 that failed to activate cyclin E also failed to promote G1/S transition. Instead, cells became arrested in G1. S-phase entry could be rescued in these cells by co-expression of cyclin E, but these cells still arrested in early S phase, as is the case with wild-type IE2. Our data demonstrate that IE2 can promote two independent cell-cycle functions at the same time: (i) the induction of G1/S transition via up-regulation of cyclin E, and (ii) a block in cell-cycle progression in early S phase. In G1, the proliferative activity of IE2 appears to be dominant over the anti-proliferative force, whereas after G1/S transition, this situation is reversed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiebusch et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: