Key result
16S rRNA Q-PCR demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of 91.9% for scrub typhus, which was significantly higher than 56-kDa N-PCR (81.1%), 47-kDa Q-PCR (74.3%), and 16S rRNA C-PCR (87.8%).
Why the study?
Does 16S rRNA real-time PCR improve diagnostic sensitivity for scrub typhus compared to other PCR methods in adult patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=148)
No
Does 16S rRNA real-time PCR improve diagnostic sensitivity for scrub typhus compared to other PCR methods in adult patients?
16S rRNA real-time PCR provides higher sensitivity for the rapid diagnosis of scrub typhus compared to other PCR methods, including in patients not pre-treated with antibiotics.
16S rRNA Q-PCR offers high diagnostic sensitivity for scrub typhus; leaves open whether it improves outcomes over serology in prospective use.
Background: Scrub typhus is a major acute febrile disease in the Asia-Pacific region. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the clinical usefulness of real-time PCR (Q-PCR) of 16S rRNA for the diagnosis of scrub typhus.Methods: We examined blood specimens from 148 adult patients who were confirmed to have scrub typhus from September 2008 to December 2009. Among the 148 scrub typhus patients, 36 patients were treated with antibiotics before admission. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of 16S rRNA Q-PCR, we compared its diagnostic accuracy to the accuracy of the following methods: nested PCR (N-PCR) targeting the gene encoding the 56-kDa protein, Q-PCR targeting the gene encoding the 47-kDa protein, and conventional PCR (C-PCR) targeting the 16S rRNA gene.Results: According to 16S rRNA Q-PCR and 47-kDa Q-PCR, the mild group had copy numbers of 234.4 and 130.5, whereas the severe group had copy numbers of 584.4 and 244.7, respectively. In both tests, the mean copy numbers were significantly greater in the severe group (P<0.01 and P=0.01). 16S rRNA Q-PCR detected Orientia tsutsugamushi infections with a sensitivity of 91.9%, and 56-kDa N-PCR, 47-kDa Q-PCR, and 16S rRNA C-PCR exhibited lower sensitivities of 81.1%, 74.3%, and 87.8%, respectively, for all 148 patients. In addition, 16S rRNA Q-PCR exhibited a sensitivity of 99.1% in the 112 patients who were not treated with antibiotics before admission.Conclusion: 16S rRNA Q-PCR is clinically useful for the rapid diagnosis of scrub typhus and is more accurate than the 56-kDa N-PCR, 47-kDa Q-PCR, and 16S C-PCR methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Scrub typhus (n=148). 16S rRNA real-time PCR (Q-PCR) vs. 56-kDa N-PCR, 47-kDa Q-PCR, and 16S rRNA C-PCR was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity for scrub typhus (p=<0.01). 16S rRNA Q-PCR demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of 91.9% for scrub typhus, which was significantly higher than 56-kDa N-PCR (81.1%), 47-kDa Q-PCR (74.3%), and 16S rRNA C-PCR (87.8%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: