Key result
Copeptin rivals procalcitonin for diagnosing sepsis and predicts higher 30-day mortality at elevated admission levels.
Why the study?
The diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of copeptin in septic patients compared to procalcitonin assessment was evaluated due to limited data on its clinical role in sepsis.
Does copeptin assessment provide diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with sepsis compared to procalcitonin?
Observational (n=105)
No
Does copeptin assessment provide diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with sepsis compared to procalcitonin?
Copeptin is a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in sepsis, with elevated admission levels (>23.2 pmol/L) predicting higher 30-day mortality.
May aid sepsis risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of copeptin were evaluated in septic patients, as compared to procalcitonin assessment. In this single centre and observational study 105 patients were enrolled: 24 with sepsis, 25 with severe sepsis, 15 with septic shock, and 41 controls, divided in two subgroups (15 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and 26 with suspected SIRS secondary to trauma, acute coronary syndrome, and pulmonary embolism). Biomarkers were determined at the first medical evaluation and thereafter 24, 48, and 72 hours after admission. Definitive diagnosis and in-hospital survival rates at 30 days were obtained through analysis of medical records. At entry, copeptin proved to be able to distinguish cases from controls and also sepsis group from septic shock group, while procalcitonin could distinguish also severe sepsis from septic shock group. Areas under the ROC curve for copeptin and procalcitonin were 0.845 and 0.861, respectively. Noteworthy, patients with copeptin concentrations higher than the threshold value (23.2 pmol/L), calculated from the ROC curve, at admission presented higher 30-day mortality. No significant differences were found in copeptin temporal profile among different subgroups. Copeptin showed promising diagnostic and prognostic role in the management of sepsis, together with its possible role in monitoring the response to treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Battista et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Sepsis (n=105). Copeptin vs. Procalcitonin was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (Area under the ROC curve). Copeptin demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for sepsis (AUC 0.845) compared to procalcitonin (AUC 0.861), with admission levels >23.2 pmol/L predicting higher 30-day mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: