Key result
During PVAC ablation, poor contact, higher power, and simultaneous energy delivery are linked to increased MES.
Why the study?
Pulmonary vein isolation with phased radiofrequency current using PVAC has been associated with high incidence of silent brain infarcts and microembolic signals, but the correlation between biophysical parameters of energy delivery and MES generation is unclear.
Do specific biophysical parameters of energy delivery predict microembolic signal generation during PVAC ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=48)
Do specific biophysical parameters of energy delivery predict microembolic signal generation during PVAC ablation for atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=<.0001
Microembolic signal generation during PVAC ablation is predicted by biophysical parameters indicating poor electrode-tissue contact and simultaneous energy delivery to proximal and distal poles.
May warrant avoiding poor contact and simultaneous delivery in PVAC ablation; hypothesis-generating for embolic risk reduction.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation with phased radiofrequency current and use of a pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) has recently been associated with a high incidence of clinically silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and a high microembolic signal (MES) count detected by transcranial Doppler. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential correlation between different biophysical parameters of energy delivery (ED) and MES generation during PVAC ablation. METHODS: MES counts during consecutive PVAC ablations were recorded for each ED and time stamped for correlation with temperature, power, and impedance data from the GENius 14.4 generator. Additionally, catheter-tissue contact was characterized by the template deviation score, calculated by comparing the temperature curve with an ideal template representing good contact, and by the respiratory contact failure score, to quantify temperature variations indicative of intermittent contact due to respiration. RESULTS: A total of 834 EDs during 48 PVAC ablations were analyzed. A significant increase in MES count was associated with a lower average temperature, a temperature integral over 62°C, a higher average power, the total energy delivered, higher respiration and template deviation scores (P <.0001), and simultaneous ED to the most proximal and distal poles of the PVAC (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: MES generation during ablation is related to different indicators of poor electrode-tissue contact, the total power delivered, and the interaction between the most distal and the most proximal electrodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagy-Baló et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=48). Biophysical parameters of energy delivery during PVAC ablation was evaluated on Microembolic signal (MES) count (p=<.0001). Poor electrode-tissue contact, higher power, and simultaneous proximal/distal energy delivery during PVAC ablation were significantly associated with increased microembolic signal generation (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: