Key result
RSVPreF3 vaccination yields a ~3.3 return on investment in older adults versus no vaccination.
Why the study?
Respiratory syncytial virus causes significant morbidity and mortality among older adults and high-risk individuals, and the societal value of RSV vaccination in Japan was not established.
Does adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination improve economic return on investment compared to no vaccination in older and high-risk adults in Japan?
Does adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination improve economic return on investment compared to no vaccination in older and high-risk adults in Japan?
Adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination in older and high-risk adults in Japan is projected to yield a positive return on investment from a societal perspective.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support targeted RSVPreF3 programs in Japan; leaves open real-world validation of modeled cost-effectiveness.
Objective: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes significant morbidity and mortality among older adults and individuals with chronic conditions. This study conducted a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to evaluate the societal value of RSV vaccination with the adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein (RSVPreF3) vaccine among older adults aged ≥60 years and high-risk adults aged 50-59 years in Japan. Methods: An actuarial population projection model, combined with a full CBA framework adapted to the Japanese setting, was used to estimate costs and benefits of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination versus no vaccination over a 10-year time horizon. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. Results: Our results indicate that a 5-year vaccination program among older adults, including those aged 50-59 years at higher risk for severe RSV disease and those aged ≥60 years, was associated with substantial economic benefits. Among older adults aged ≥60 years, the total return on investment (ROI) was 3.3 with or without deadweight loss (DWL), with vaccination projected to avert Japanese Yen (JPY) 35,501 M in productive output loss, save JPY 1,178,403 M in direct healthcare costs, and prevent JPY 10,699,729 M in monetized quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) loss. For high-risk adults aged 50-59 years, the total ROI was 3.7 without DWL and 3.8 with DWL, with corresponding reductions of JPY 17,889 M in productive output loss, JPY 10,400 M in healthcare costs, and JPY 266,116 M in monetized QALY loss. Conclusion: Overall, adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination among older adults in Japan represents good value for money from a societal perspective, where vaccine acquisition and administration costs are expected to be outweighed by substantial health, productivity, and broader economic benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zarkadoulas et al. (2026) studied Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein (RSVPreF3) vaccine vs. No vaccination was evaluated on Total return on investment (ROI) (ROI 3.3). Adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination in Japan yielded a total return on investment of 3.3 among adults aged ≥60 years and 3.7 among high-risk adults aged 50-59 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: