Key result
European guidelines outline core lifestyle and medical strategies for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention.
Why the study?
Despite significant decreases in cardiovascular mortality in developed countries due to treatments and prevention strategies, rising obesity and type 2 diabetes threaten this progress.
This review summarizes the 2016 European Guidelines for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases, highlighting lifestyle interventions and secondary prevention strategies.
Rising obesity/diabetes may offset CVD mortality gains; leaves open optimal prevention intensification in real-world practice.
Cardiovascular diseases are the main causes of premature death worldwide despite the fact that cardiovascular mortality decreased significantly in the last few decades in financially developed countries. This reduction is partly due to the modern medical and revascularisation treatments, and partly because of the effectiveness of prevention strategies such as lowering blood pressure and cholesterol level, as well as successful strategies against smoking. However, this positive trend is undermined by the striking growth in obesity and in type 2 diabetes mellitus, which could also be successfully controlled by lifestyle changes. This summary is based on an overview of the recent (2016) European Guideline for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases. Here the authors describe preventive strategies and goals to be achieved, the most important lifestyle suggestions, and the secondary prevention medical treatment for patients with already established cardiovascular disease. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(38), 1526-1531.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vértes et al. (2016) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases. 2016 European Guideline for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases was evaluated. The 2016 European Guideline for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases outlines preventive strategies, lifestyle suggestions, and secondary prevention medical treatments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: