Key result
Competition shows no increase in arrhythmias compared to training in Thoroughbred Chuckwagon racehorses.
Why the study?
Electrocardiograms in exercising horses are acquired during training but not competition due to regulatory constraints, raising questions about the repeatability of arrhythmia findings.
Does competition compared to training alter the frequency and type of arrhythmias in Thoroughbred racehorses?
Observational (n=52)
Does competition compared to training alter the frequency and type of arrhythmias in Thoroughbred racehorses?
In Thoroughbred racehorses, the total number of arrhythmias is repeatable between training and competition, suggesting training ECGs may be adequate for overall arrhythmia screening despite poor reliability for specific arrhythmia types.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Training ECGs may approximate competition findings in healthy racehorses; leaves open whether serial recordings reliably classify arrhythmia types.
Arrhythmias are commonly reported in exercising horses, however due to regulatory constraints electrocardiograms (ECGs) are acquired during training but not competition, raising questions about the repeatability of findings. The aims were (1) compare training and competition arrhythmias and (2) describe the repeatability of arrhythmias during maximal-intensity exercise. A convenience sample of 52 healthy Thoroughbreds (aged 8.7 ± 2.5 years) competing in the World Professional Chuckwagon Association were obtained, totaling 152 training or competition ECGs (2-7 ECGs/horse). Speed, heart rate (HR) and arrhythmias (supraventricular premature complex, SVPC; ventricular premature complex, VPC) were examined. Pre- and post-recovery (approximately 6 min) blood samples measured lactate and high-sensitivity troponin-T. Training and competition arrythmias were compared (Friedman's test) and reliability of repeated ECGs assessed (intraclass correlation; P < 0.05). Training vs. competition: Forty horses had clean tracing from training and competition (n = 80 ECGs); the number and type of arrhythmias were not different. In training, VPCs were present in 7/40 horses (median [interquartile range, IQR]/ECG; range; 0 [0,0]; 0-4) and 9/40 horses (0 [0,0]; 0-5) in active-recovery. In competition, VPCs were present in 7/40 horses (0 [0,0]; 0-8) and 8/40 horses (0 [0,0]; 0-5) in active-recovery. Arrhythmias were primarily single premature complexes. Training and competition speed, HR, lactate and troponin-T did not differ however, sampling was too early for peak serum Troponin-T levels. Repeatability: total arrhythmias between serial ECGs did not differ. The reliability to detect SVPCs and VPCs was poor to moderate, and poor, respectively. Overall, the total number of arrhythmias was repeatable, but the reliability of arrhythmia type was poor to moderate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massie et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Healthy Thoroughbred Chuckwagon racehorses (n=52). Training vs. Competition was evaluated on Presence of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) during exercise. The number and type of arrhythmias did not differ between training and competition in Thoroughbred Chuckwagon racehorses, with VPCs present in 17.5% of horses during both activities.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: