This work establishes a comparison between functions on derived loop spaces (Toën and Vezzosi, Chern character, loop spaces and derived algebraic geometry , in Algebraic topology: the Abel symposium 2007 , Abel Symposia, vol. 4, eds N. Baas, E. M. Friedlander, B. Jahren and P. A. Østvær (Springer, 2009), ISBN:978-3-642-01199-3) and de Rham theory. If A is a smooth commutative k -algebra and k has characteristic 0, we show that two objects, S 1 ⊗ A and ϵ( A ), determine one another, functorially in A . The object S 1 ⊗ A is the S 1 -equivariant simplicial k -algebra obtained by tensoring A by the simplicial group S 1 := B ℤ, while the object ϵ( A ) is the de Rham algebra of A , endowed with the de Rham differential, and viewed as a ϵ-dg-algebra (see the main text). We define an equivalence φ between the homotopy theory of simplicial commutative S 1 -equivariant k -algebras and the homotopy theory of ϵ-dg-algebras, and we show the existence of a functorial equivalence ϕ( S 1 ⊗ A )∼ϵ( A ) . We deduce from this the comparison mentioned above, identifying the S 1 -equivariant functions on the derived loop space LX of a smooth k -scheme X with the algebraic de Rham cohomology of X / k . As corollaries, we obtain functorial and multiplicative versions of decomposition theorems for Hochschild homology (in the spirit of Hochschild–Kostant–Rosenberg) for arbitrary semi-separated k -schemes. By construction, these decompositions are moreover compatible with the S 1 -action on the Hochschild complex, on one hand, and with the de Rham differential, on the other hand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toën et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: