Key result
Pre-incisional levobupivacaine and bupivacaine significantly reduced macroscopic adhesion scores compared to isotonic control (p<0.001), and levobupivacaine improved colon histopathology (p=0.011).
Why the study?
Does pre-incisional levobupivacaine or bupivacaine improve colonic anastomosis and wound healing in a rat model?
Does pre-incisional levobupivacaine or bupivacaine improve colonic anastomosis and wound healing in a rat model?
p-value: p=<0.001
In a rat model, pre-incisional levobupivacaine improved wound histopathology and colonic anastomosis durability compared to bupivacaine and isotonic controls.
Levobupivacaine may improve histopathology scores and reduce adhesions in rat colonic anastomosis; leaves open translation to human practice.
BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that levobupivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine but carries a lower risk of cardiac and central nervous system toxicity. This study explores whether levobupivacaine and bupivacaine are preferable for all patients, includ-ing those with comorbidities, particularly focusing on their effects on colonic anastomosis. The primary objective is to examine the influence of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on colonic anastomosis. Additionally, the study will assess their impact on wound healing and their anti-adhesive properties. METHODS: Conducted between July 28, 2022, to August 4, 2022, at the Hamidiye Animal Experiments Laboratory, this study was approved by the University Science Health, Hamidiye Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee. This study was conducted using 21 male Sprague rats aged 16-20 weeks. The rats were allocated into three equal groups of seven each: Group C: pre-incisional isotonic; Group B: pre-incisional bupivacaine; and Group L: pre-incisional levobupivacaine. Macroscopic adhesion scores (MAS) were recorded during laparotomy and tissue samples were taken for histopathological examination and hydroxyproline levels measurement. Wound tensile strength along the middle incision line and anastomotic burst pressure were also assessed. RESULTS: MAS was statistically significantly lower in Groups B and L compared to Group C (p<0.001). The wound histopathology score (WHS) was significantly higher in Group L than in Group B (p=0.021). Colon histopathology scores (CHSs) were also signifi-cantly higher in Group L compared to Group C (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: TThe study found that bupivacaine and levobupivacaine did not significantly enhance wound healing, although le-vobupivacaine significantly improved WHS relative to bupivacaine. According to the findings of this study, levobupivacaine can enhance clinical practice by being used in patients undergoing colon anastomosis. It contributes significantly to the durability of colon anasto-mosis, has a more positive effect on wound healing compared to bupivacaine, and exhibits anti-adhesive properties. Additional clinical trials are necessary to validate these results further.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ugur Kesıcı (2024) studied Colon anastomosis and wound healing (n=21). Levobupivacaine and bupivacaine vs. Isotonic solution was evaluated on Macroscopic adhesion scores (MAS) (p=<0.001). Pre-incisional levobupivacaine and bupivacaine significantly reduced macroscopic adhesion scores compared to isotonic control (p<0.001), and levobupivacaine improved colon histopathology (p=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: